Close

We are happy to announce that we're celebrating 30 years! →

Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Firma De Abogados En Chicago Investigando Presenta Demandas A Nivel Nacional Contra AstraZeneca, El Fabricante de Nexium y Prilosec, Relacionado a Enfermedades Renales Crónicas Y Ataque Al Corazón

CHICAGO, 18 de Abril, 2016: Un bufete de abogados de Chicago hoy afirmó que está investigando la interposición de demandas en todo el país en contra de AstraZeneca, los fabricantes de Prilosec y Nexium. Moll Law Group ha sido contactado y actualmente está investigando reclamos de enfermedad renal crónica, lesión renal aguda, nefritis…

Updated:

Chicago Law Firm Investigating the Filing of Lawsuits Nationwide Against AstraZeneca, The Maker of Nexium and Prilosec, For Chronic Kidney Disease and Heart Attack Injuries

CHICAGO, April 18, 2016: A Chicago law firm stated today that it is investigating the filing of lawsuits nationwide against AstraZeneca, the makers of Prilosec and Nexium. Moll Law Group has been contacted and is currently investigating claims of chronic kidney disease, acute kidney injury, acute interstitial nephritis, renal failure,…

Updated:

Concealing Past Traffic Tickets Causes Judgment in Road Rage Case to Be Vacated

In a recent case, a commercial truck driver alleged that another driver engaged in road rage, causing him to crash. However, after the jury found in favor of the defendant, the decision was vacated due to the defendant’s concealment of past traffic tickets. The truck driver argued that the defendant…

Updated:

United States Supreme Court Issues Ruling on the Use of Representative Evidence in Class Action Lawsuits

The United States Supreme Court recently issued a key ruling involving class action litigation. In Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, the high court was asked to consider whether the plaintiffs could use the “representative evidence” method of proving predominance according to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). The plaintiffs were employees…

Updated:

Exposure to Toxic Chemicals Can Have Devastating Effects

Toxic substances can cause serious sicknesses with long-lasting effects. Toxic tort cases are a specific type of personal injury lawsuit in which the plaintiff claims that being exposed to chemicals caused the plaintiff injury. The cases usually require specialized, technical testimony from expert witnesses. Sometimes cases are brought against private…

Updated:

Nestle Initiates Recall Over Fears that Frozen Food Products Contain Glass

Nestle Corporation is one of the biggest food manufacturers in the world, with many people associating the brand with the chocolates and other sweets it makes. It also produces a wide variety of frozen foods under a variety of labels, including Stouffer’s, Lean Cuisine, and DiGiorno pizza. The manufacturing process…

Updated:

Attorney Fails to Make Timely Objection, so Judgment in Product Liability Case Must Stand

Even when individuals have a valid claim, a lawyer’s missteps can have serious consequences for their clients. In a recent case, a judgment in favor of the defendant could not be revisited because the issue raised on appeal was not raised by the plaintiffs’ lawyer during the trial. The Facts…

Updated:

New Jersey Appellate Court Upholds $11 Million Verdict Against J&J in Pelvic Mesh Suit

An appellate court in New Jersey has issued an opinion upholding a jury’s award of $11.1 million against medical device manufacturer Johnson & Johnson in a pelvic mesh product liability lawsuit. The verdict came at the close of a two-month trial in which plaintiffs Linda and Jeffrey Gross alleged that Johnson…

Updated:

Vote for Your Favorite Essay Finalist to Determine Which Student Receives the Moll Law Group Scholarship

As a personal injury law firm serving the Chicago area for the past several decades, we have represented clients in thousands of cases involving tragic accidents that have had lasting effects on both the accident victims as well as their families. Throughout our service of the Chicago area, we have…

Updated:

Court Rules Plaintiff Has Free Choice in Future Medical Providers, Increasing Damages Award

Sometimes cases are appealed because a party disagrees with the court’s decision on the issue of liability. However, sometimes the liability issue is not disputed, and the issue on appeal is only the amount of damages awarded. In a recent case, a plaintiff argued that his damages award was incorrect…